II) The impugned communication dated 17.08.2021 by respondent No.2 is hereby quashed and set aside.
III) The matter is relegated to respondent No.2. He should consider the fact that respondent No.4 has already kept a wait list for the compassionate appointment and name of the [8] wp-11657-2021.odt petitioner is at Serial No.5. On the basis of the same, he should decide to keep her name in the wait list.
IV) Respondent No.2 should also consider as to whether respondent No.5 could have been appointed in place of the husband of the petitioner and to consider the prayer of the petitioner to direct respondent Nos.3 and 4 to appoint her on compassionate ground.