1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties heard finally.
30 of 65 ::: Uploaded on - 20/03/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 21/03/2024 11:51:49 ::: Tauseef 01-WP.16025.2022-J.doc
2. This group of petitions raises common issues and, therefore, are disposed of by this common judgment. We, therefore, propose to deal with facts in Writ Petition No.16025 of 2022 for the purpose of our adjudication.
Challenge :-
3. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are challenging the order dated 25th March 2022 passed by the Mumbai Bench of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal') in Original Application (O.A.) No.733 of 2019. Since the said order follows the order passed by the Aurangabad Bench of the Tribunal in O.A. No.722 of 2019 dated 4 th March 2022, the Petitioners have also challenged the said order passed by the Aurangabad Bench of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal has quashed the Government Resolution dated 22nd April 2019 to absorb 636 candidates who have secured 230 and above marks.