Quantcast
Channel: Bombay High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 812

Sayas Nagnath Surnar vs The State Of Mahrashtra And Others on 4 April, 2024

$
0
0

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties.

2. By the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has put forth prayer clause- B', C & D as under:

"B) By issue of Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or directions in like nature, the impugned order dt. 26.6.2019 passed by the Respondent No.2 Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad Latur, may kindly be quashed and set aside.

C) By issue of Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or Directions in like nature, the impugned order dt. 26.6.2019 passed by the Respondent No.2 Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad Latur, may kindly be modified and salary of the petitioner be continued as Assistant Teacher working with respondent no. 4 school D) To hold and declare that the impugned order dt. 26.6.2019 passed by the respondent no. 2 Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad Latur is null and void."


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 812

Trending Articles